Scientific knowledge of head injury resulting from sport dates to the 1800s.
Between 2007 and 2014, all U.S. states passed concussion legislation regulating
youth sports participation.
Why were some U.S. states slower than others to pass concussion laws
with return to play restrictions?
What did the researcher do?
The researchers located and analyzed data from 50 U.S. states on concussion laws and high school sports
participation rates. Discourse around concussions has focused on youth athletes as a population at risk,
which require risk-reduction medical policies to protect them. The amount of
youth sport participation in a state identifies a key group of at-risk
individuals. If a disease only affects a few individuals, it is less likely that medically informed laws will be passed.
The concussion issue was framed by the NFL and others in terms of youth safety
across all activities.
The constituency hypothesis: States with higher
levels of youth sport participation will adopt concussion legislation earlier.
Alternatively, youth sport involvement could delay the adoption of concussion laws. Powerful social organizations and actors influence culturally significant activities.
Cultural norms regarding youth sport have undermined the push for greater attention to
head injuries. Interwoven themes of masculinity, violence and being "headstrong" have a long history in the NFL, and
these same themes resonate in American football culture at all levels of competition.
Consider the perspective of Chicago Bears wide receiver Brandon Marshall when commenting on
the Miami Dolphins "bullying" scandal.1
The resistance hypothesis: States with higher levels of youth sport participation will adopt concussion
legislation later.
What did the researchers find?
Institutional medicalization (the passage of medically informed legislation) varies with time and place.
Social context helps determine why states pass medically informed legislation at different times.
States with more high school football participation passed concussion laws later.
States with a strong college football presence (SEC Conference membership) passed concussion laws later.
States with more gender egalitarian views passed concussion laws earlier.
How can you use this research?
Policy makers can use this research to help craft public health strategies that incorporate understanding
of unique social and cultural dynamics influencing the passage of public health law at the state level. Understanding these
unique processes can help legislators formulate more comprehensive strategies to address public health crises.
Public health organizations can use this research to inform their strategies for targeting public health
problems in regions with greater resistance to these changes.
Citation
Rotolo T, Lengefeld M. 2020. "Clearing the cobwebs: An analysis of the timing of youth concussion legislation in
U.S. states." Soc Sci Med. Nov 2:113491. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2020.113491. PMID: 33162197.